Bring Vermont Inmates Home

printed in the Valley News, Feb. 2015

To the Editor:

Thank you for the article by Laura Krantz of VtDigger covering the modest reduction in out-of-state placements in the Vermont Corrections system (“Vt. Out-of-State Prison Population to Dip,” Jan. 14).

I have become involved with Vermonters for Criminal Justice Reform, a group dedicated to ending the practice of sending inmates to for-profit prisons outside of Vermont. A recent count shows that there are more than 200 prisoners in Vermont who have finished their sentences or are eligible for parole but are being held, at an average cost of $57,000 per year, because of a lack of “approved housing.” At a time when towns all over the state are considering budget cuts, why are we sending $57,000 per year per person to a for-profit company (Corrections Corporation of America) to house these individuals when we could find 200 open spaces tomorrow?

This simple change would cut Vermont’s out-of-state prison population by 50 percent, and, each year, we would save the $22 million per year it costs to imprison these people longer than necessary. Even if we used some of this money to improve or expand housing stock, at least the money and jobs would stay here in Vermont, not help pay for the CCA executive jet fleet and $3.2 million annual CEO compensation.

– Tom Cecere

No more new crimes

     Perhaps the most misguided and least effective action the legislature regularly takes is to create new crimes—that is, to criminalize behaviors we all want to prevent. But why does a group of such smart, thoughtful people do something over and over that most of us know is a bad idea?
      Calling something a crime doesn’t prevent it from happening, any more than does increasing penalties on an already existing crime. It only sucks more people into the criminal justice system, which as most people know is like a tar baby; every touch, every encounter, gets you more stuck and makes your life harder.
     Believing otherwise is magical thinking.    
     It doesn’t take a lot of sensitivity to observe that people who are struggling, whose lives are on the edge, need help more than punishment. Nor does it take a particular political perspective to believe that parents and children at risk are better served by supports that aim to prevent disasters than by punishments after the fact.
     Knowing the players as I do, I think it can’t be lack of empathy, or lack of awareness of the realities of struggling families, that drives the impulse to punish. Perhaps it arises out of frustration with our inability to prevent humans from hurting each other. As individuals we do what we can, and some people believe government should try to keep people safe. But it can’t. Nothing any of us can do can keep all of us safe all the time. And acting ineffectively out of our own frustration only makes things worse, like screaming at a crying child.    
     The proposal to create a new felony in response to the profoundly sad deaths of two children may be well intentioned, but it’s worse than misguided. Do we Vermonters really want to put more struggling parents in jail? Our current practice of relying on punishment rather than support has already resulted in the over-incarceration of low-income Vermonters. It’s time to get off that path.

Letter to the Caledonian Record Editor

To the Editor:

We are writing in response to your recent editorial about the Locked Up and #Shipped Away campaign.  You address what appear to be the cost savings of shipping approximately 500 Vermont prisoners to the Lee Adjustment Center in Kentucky.  This prison is run by the Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), a private, for-profit business.  How would a for-profit prison do well?  By getting and keeping more people imprisoned for as long as possible.

 According to The Sentencing Project website, “The United States is the world's leader in incarceration with 2.2 million people currently in the nation's prisons or jails -- a 500% increase over the past thirty years.”  Interestingly, CCA was founded in 1983, thirty-one years ago.  

A recent article in the Huffington Post states that, “profits of corporations have been prioritized ahead of prison conditions, offender rehabilitation and reentry. Similarly, problems like these have a demonstrated effect on worker safety, putting correctional officers at risk when inmate morale is impacted by subhuman, deplorable conditions. These problems are enough to make any government think twice about outsourcing prison services.”  Short-term savings result in long-term costs.

In addition, SourceWatch reports that the CCA was converted into a real estate investment trust in 2013 to help the company avoid tens of millions of dollars in corporate taxes.  “CCA’s revenue in 2013 was nearly $1.7 billion, and it had profits of $300 million, 100 percent of which came from taxpayers via government contracts.”  Cost savings?  We think not.  

Most people who are imprisoned are going to return to their communities at some point.  Numerous studies have shown that visitation and community connections are crucial in supporting people to reintegrate successfully and not re-offend.  

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, we take issue with your deeply offensive characterization of family members of those who are imprisoned in Kentucky.  Referring to members of our community as “sobbing moms” is disrespectful, provocative, and simply unnecessary.  Make your arguments with which your readers can agree or disagree.  Attempting to publicly shame and humiliate people who are suffering serves only to bring shame upon yourself.

Paul Marcus & Patricia Shine
Concord, Vermont

“Keep Away”

“Send them all to Kentucky, we say. To Siberia, for all we care.”

Are the women who speak out about the pain they feel having their sons locked up miles away “sobbing moms”?  Or are they among our most courageous citizens, braving derision and attack?


U.S. Prison Population Grew in 2013 – and so did Vermont's

by David N. Adair, Jr. VCJR Board of Directors

The Justice Department has reported that the overall prison population in the United States rose slightly in 2013, reversing a trend of decline that began in 2009.  


Rethinking Sex Offender Laws

by David N. Adair, Jr. VCJR Board of Directors

The Federal “Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Act of 1994” created incentives for states to create sex offender registries and every state has now done so.  And states have designated which offenses will trigger an offender’s duty to register.  The logic behind such laws was the belief (mistaken, it turns out) that sexual offenders were not amenable to rehabilitation, that they were more likely to recidivate than other offenders, and that they were likely to prey upon strangers.  Accordingly, it was believed, a central registry of such offenders could help protect the public from the likelihood of reoffense. 


State Incarceration Rates in the Global Context

by David N. Adair, Jr. VCJR Board of Directors

Did you know that 36 states and the District of Columbia incarcerate their citizens at rates higher than Cuba?  And that Vermont, which has the lowest incarceration rate in the United States, ranks between Guyana and Colombia?


Locked Up & Shipped Away: Paying the Price for Vermont’s Response to Prison Overcrowding

locked up shipped away vt-200Grassroots Leadership's report "Locked Up & Shipped Away: Paying the Price for Vermont’s Response to Prison Overcrowding" has been released. Download a copy of the report in PDF format.

Did CCA Neglect Lead to Inmate's Death?

Pointing the finger--in the wrong direction

Most people know by now that the U.S. contains 25% of the world’s inmates although only 5% of the world’s population.  And most Vermonters know we have the same over-incarceration problem as the rest of the country.  We have sentenced to prison more people than we have room to house, and therefore we send our overflow (500 or so men) out of state, where a privately owned, for-profit prison corporation houses—some would say “warehouses”—them for us.


Another Proposal to Profit from Prisoners Defeated – For Now

by David N. Adair, Jr. VCJR Board of Directors

A Dallas County (Texas) legislative body last week refused to approve a proposed contract that would have provided video conferencing for inmates and their families. Of course, providing more opportunities for families to communicate with prisoners is helpful in maintaining family ties and assists prisoners to reintegrate into their communities upon release.


Will “data-based” sentencing result in more profiling?

by David N. Adair, Jr. VCJR Board of Directors

With the recent passage of S.295 (now Act 195), Vermont has enthusiastically embraced use of data-driven analytical tools to assess the risks and needs of offenders in the hopes of providing a more effective and appropriate response to crime. 


Fewer Prisoners, Less Crime?

by David N. Adair, Jr. VCJR Board of Directors

The Sentencing Project has released a new publication that highlights the experience of three states, all of which have reduced their prison populations while experiencing reductions in crime. 


Vermonters for Criminal Justice Reform
PO Box 8753, Burlington, VT 05402
(802) 503-0601

Contact us:

Vermonters for Criminal Justice Reform 
is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization

facebook  twitter